النظام القانوني للأحزاب السياسية في الأردن: دراسة مقارنة
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This study is a critical and comparative analysis of the legal system for political parties in Jordan. It covers the provisions relating to the right to establish political parties in the new Jordanian Political Parties Law No. (39) of 2015, which replaced the old law of 2012. The study focuses on the rules in the 2015 law defining a political party and the legal procedures for establishing one. The rules were designed to promote the principle of independence of political parties. For this purpose, a Committee for the Affairs of Political Parties was set up to decide on the registration of political parties. The study also addresses the rules relating to the funding of political parties in Jordan, which impose objective restrictions on the right of political parties to receive gifts and donations from both national and foreign donors. This study also touches on the rules governing the resolutions of political parties, which were aimed at limiting legislative power over the fate of political parties in favour of giving the judiciary the upper hand to decide on the resolutions of political parties. The provisions in the Jordanian law of 2015 will be compared with their counterparts in other Arab laws in order to assess the strengths and weaknesses in the Jordanian law, and to try to benefit from the experience of other Arab countries in the field of preserving the constitutional right of establishing political parties.
Metrics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Jordanian Law on political partiesthe Committee on the Affairs of Political Partiesfinancing of political partiesresolution of political parties
Copied to clipboard
Similar Articles
- Jasmin Ademović , Is Legalism always the Best Approach? Between an Atomistic and Holistic Approach to Post-Conflict Societies , International Review of Law: Vol. 2018 No. 2&3
- Joost Pauwelyn, Theresa Carpenter, The TradeLab Network of Legal Clinics: Capacity Building for a More Inclusive Globalization , International Review of Law: Vol. 2018 No. 1: (TradeLab Special Issue)
- HO Shaaban, الاتجاهات الحديثة للتخلي عن الاختصاص القضائي الدولي في ضوء حكم محكمة النقض المصرية الصادر بتاريخ 24/3/2014 – دراسة تأصيلية تحليلية مقارنة , International Review of Law: Vol. 2017 No. 3
- M Nouh, Reconciliation as a means of resolving autonomous administrative disputes , International Review of Law: Vol. 2017 No. 3
- Siyuan Chen, The limits on prosecutorial discretion in Singapore: Past, present, and future , International Review of Law: Vol. 2013 No. 1
- AA. Al-Melhem, The legal characterization of the accrual of assets and liabilities from a public enterprise to a shareholding company in light of privatization laws in Kuwait: Comment on the current and recommended theory , International Review of Law: Vol. 2013 No. 1
- ojsadmin production, Comparative law in the global context , International Review of Law: Vol. 2013 No. 3
- Mary Pat Treuthart, Stephen A. Rosenbaum, Engendering a clinic: Lessons learned from a domestic violence clinical course in Qatar , International Review of Law: Vol. 2013 No. 4
- Muhammad Munir, Dissecting the claims of legitimization for the ritual of female circumcision or female genital mutilation (FGM) , International Review of Law: Vol. 2014 No. 2
- A. Rouabhi, تحديات تطبيق القانون الدولي الإنساني أثناء النزاعات غير المتماثلة , International Review of Law: Vol. 2015 No. 1
<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.