تقييم الأمان القانوني في ضوء لائحة الإفلاس الأوروبية
الملخص
يتناول البحث قواعد الإفلاس وفق قوانين الاتحاد الأوروبي وبالتحديد لائحة الإفلاس للاتحاد الأوربي المعدلة لتحديد ما إذا كانت هذه القواعد تعزز الأمان القانوني في قضايا الإفلاس العابر للحدود المتضمن لمجموعات الشركات وذلك للحد من حالات التسوق القضائي الاستغلالي. وتعتبر مشكلة الإفلاس العابر الحدود من المشكلات المعاصرة في خضم التجارة الدولية والتكامل الاقتصادي بين مناطق العالم المختلفة كالاتحاد الأوروبي. ويقصد بالتسوق القضائي البحث من قبل الشركة عن المحكمة المفضلة لديها للقيام بإجراءات التفليسة. ويعد التسوق القضائي استغلالياً في حالة أنه حقق لأحد الأطراف مصلحة على محاسب الأطراف الأخرى.
يتضمن المقال الأقسام الآتية: القسم الأول يلقي نظرة عامة على لائحة الإفلاس الأوروبية المعدلة، وتناول القسم الثاني اهم بنود اللائحة الأوربية المعدلة والتي تتعلق بتعزيز الأمان القانوني وتقليل التسوق القضائي الاستغلالي، كما يطرح القسم الثالث بعض المقترحات لتطوير اللائحة المعدلة بهدف تعزيز الأمان القانوني وذلك للحد من التسوق القضائي الاستغلالي، مع خاتمة في القسم الأخير.
المقاييس
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
الإفلاسمجموعات الشركاتقانون الشركاتالتسوق القضائيالأمان القانوني
American Cases
Global Telesystems Inc v KPNQwest NV 151 F.Supp.2d 478 (SDNY 2001)
English Cases
Collins & Aikman Europe SA, Re [2005] EWHC 1754 (Ch), [2006] BCC 861
Daisytek-ISA Ltd and Others, Re [2003] All ER (D) 312
MG Rover Espana and other Subsidiaries [2005] BPIR 1162, [2006] BCC579.
Stanford International Bank Limited, Re [2009] EWHC 1441 (Ch), [2009] BPIR 1157
CJEU Cases
Case C-341/04 Eurofood IFSC Ltd [2006] ECR 1-3813
Case C-396/09 Interedil SrI (In liquidation) v Fallimento Interedil SrI and another [2011] WLR 334
List of Legal Instruments
Insolvency Proceedings [2000] OJ L160/1
Insolvency Proceedings (recast) [2015] OJ L141/19
A
Aasaru E, ‘The Desirability of Centre of Main Interests as a Mechanism for Allocating Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Cross-Border Insolvency Law’ (2011) 22 European Business Law Review 349
B
Bell A, Forum Shopping and Venue in Transnational Litigation (Oxford University Press 2003)
Bewick S, ‘First do no Harm -Changes to the EU Insolvency Regulation’ (2012) 5 Corporate Rescue and Insolvency 207
— — ‘The EU Insolvency Regulation Revisited’ (2015) 24 International Insolvency Review 172
Bork R and Managano R, European Cross-Border Insolvency Law (Oxford University Press 2016)
Braithwaite J, ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’ (2002) 27 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 47
C
van Calster G, ‘COMIng, and here to Stay. The Review of the European Insolvency Regulation’ [Unpublished] (SSRN 2016)
E
Esser P, ‘Reform of the EU Regulation New Framework for Insolvent Company Groups: Part 1’ (2015) 34 American Bankruptcy Institute Journal 38
F
Fletcher I, Insolvency Law in Private International Law (2nd, Oxford University Press 2005)
H
Hannigan B, Company Law (4th edn, Oxford University Press 2016)
Hess B, Oberhammer P and Pfeiffer T, European Insolvency Regulation Heidelberg-Luxembourg-Vienna Report (Hart Publishing 2014)
M
McCormack G, ‘Jurisdiction Competition and Forum Shopping in Insolvency Proceedings’ (2009) 68 The Cambridge Law Journal 169
— — ‘COMI and Comity in UK and US Insolvency Law’ (2012) 128 Law Quarterly Review 140
— — ‘Reconciling European Conflict and Insolvency Law’ (2014) 15 European Business Organization Law Review 309
— — ‘Bankruptcy Forum Shopping: the UK and US as Venues of Choice for Foreign Companies’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 815;
— — ‘Reforming the European Insolvency Regulation: A Legal and Policy Perspective’ (2014) 10 Journal of Private International Law 49
— — ‘Something Old, Something New: Recasting the European Insolvency Regulation’ (2016) 79 The Modern Law Review 121
Mevorach I, Insolvency within Multinational Enterprise Groups (Oxford University Press 2009)
— — ‘The Home Country’ of a Multinational Enterprise Group Facing Insolvency’ (2008) 57 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 427
— — ‘Beyond the Search for Certainty: Addressing the Cross-Border Resolution Gap’ (2015) 10 Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial and Commercial Law 183
Mucciarelli F, ‘Private International Law Rules in the Insolvency Regulation Recast: A Reform or a Restatement of the Status Quo’ [Unpublished] (SSRN, 25 August 2015)
P
Popelier P, ‘Legal Certainty and Principle of Proper Law Making’ (2000) 2 European Journal of Law Reform 321
S
Sarra J, ‘Oversight and Financing of Cross-Border Business Enterprise Group Insolvency Proceedings’ (2009) 44 Texas International Law Journal 547
T
Thole C and Duenas M, ‘Some Observations on the New Group Coordination Procedure of the Reformed European Insolvency Regulation’ (2015) 24 International Insolvency Review 214
Tirado I, , ‘An Evaluation of COMI in the European Insolvency Regulation: From
‘Insolvenzimperialismus’ to the Recast’ (2015) Annal Review of Insolvency Law 691.
Tollenaar N, ‘Dealing with the Insolvency of Multi-National Groups under the European Insolvency Regulation’ (2010) 23 Insolvency Intelligence 65
V
Vette E, ‘Multinational Enterprise Groups in Insolvency: How Should the European Union Act?’ (2011) 7 Utrecht Law Review 216
W
Wade J, ‘The Centre of Main Interests Connecting Factor Affords Creditors no Certainty under the Model Law Regime’ (2011) 22 International Company and Commercial Law Review 102
Weijs R and Breeman M, ‘Comi-Migration: Use or Abuse of European Insolvency Law’ (2015) 11 European Company and Financial Law Review 495
Weiss M, ‘Bridge over Troubled Water: The Revised Insolvency Regulation’ (2015) 24 International Insolvency Review 192
Wessels B and Miguel Virgos, ‘European Communication and Cooperation Guidelines for Cross-Border Insolvency’ (INSOL Europe, July 2007)
— — ‘The Ongoing Struggle of Multinational Groups of Companies under the EC Insolvency Regulation’ (2009) 4 European Company Law 169
— — International Insolvency Law (Kluwer 2012)
Wood P, Principle of International Insolvency (Sweet &Maxwell 2007)