##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Mohammed Amezzian

Abstract

This research seeks to contribute to rationalizing the current debate concerning the process of secularization that has been enforced on Arab and Muslim societies in a systematic and organized manner. This paper also seeks to find convincing answers to the central question raised by the title of the paper: Was this process of secularization a strategic option that expresses a concurrence between the state and society or a decision imposed on these communities under coercion? The problem raised by this question is not related to secularism as a concept or an ideology but is rather related to secularization as a procedural process tied to social dynamics. The main hypothesis of this research argues that the phenomenon of secularization is both novel and alien to Arab societies. The presence of secularization is correlated with international compulsions that affected the Arab region during the colonization era and has continued due to the states’ dependency on the west during the postindependence phase. To avoid superficial answers to this question, this paper attempts to address this issue within its historical context by highlighting the facts, practices and rationale that have accompanied the Arab Muslim community’s transition towards secularization, especially after its defeat during the World War I. Moreover, the paper focuses on the significance of the sociological approach to understanding the manifestations of secular influences on social lifestyle and on the behavior of individuals, groups and official institutions under the rule of foreign laws, as well as their dominance over the culture of society and its core values.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Secularism
secularization of Arab Muslim societies
dependency
colonialism
modernization

References
• Al-Asali, Bassam, Jabhat Al-Tahrir Al-Watani Al-Jazairi, (In Arabic), (Beirut: Dar Al-Nafais li-Al- Tibah wa Al-Nashr wa Al-Tawzi, vol. 3, 1990.
• Al-Kattani, Idris, Al-Maghrib Al-Muslim Dudd Al-Ladiniyyah, (In Arabic), (Casablanca: Matbat Al- Jamiah, 1958).
• Al-Masari, Muhammad, Al-Adillah Al-Qatiyyah ala Adam Shariyyat Al-Dawlah Al-Saudiyyah, (In Arabic), (Lajnat Al-Difa an Al-Huquq Al-Shariyyah, Committee for the Defense of Legitimate Rights .Site: http://www.cdlr.net.)
• Al-Shatir, Khalifah, et all, Tunis Abr Al-Tarikh: Al-Harakah Al-Wataniyyah wa Dawlat Al-Istiqlal, (In Arabic), (Tunisia: Wizarat Al-Bahth Al-Ilmi wa Al-Taknalojya wa Tanmiyat Al-Kafat – Markaz Al- Dirasat wal Buhuth Al-Iqtisadiyyah wal Ijtimaiyyah, vol. 3, 2005).
• Al-Tahir, Abdullah, Al-Harakah Al-Wataniyyah Al-Tunusiyyah: Ruyah Shabiyyah Qawmiyyah Jadidah, (In Arabic), (Tunisia: Manshurat Dar Al-Marif li Al-Tibah wa Al-Nashr, vol. 2).
• Badie Bertrand . L’Etat importé - Essai sur l’occidentalisation de l’ordre politique. Ed. Fayard. Paris 1992.
• Benard Cheryl, Civil democratic Islam, Partners, Resources, and Strategies. Published 2003 by the RAND Corporation.
• Bozarslan Hamit. Islam, laïcité et la question d’autorité de l’empire ottoman à la Turquie kémaliste. Archives de sciences sociales des religions. Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 2004. (janviermars 2004).N. 125 pp.110-112.
• Bushlakah, Rafiq Abdul-Salam, Al-Juthur Al-Hadathiyyah lil-Istibdad, Al-Istibdad Al-Hadathi Al- Arabi: Al-Tajribah Al-Tunusiyyah Namuthujan, (In Arabic), Chapter in Al-Istibdad fi Nuzum Al-Hukm Al-Arabiyyah, Written by a group. Ed. Ali Khalifah Al-Kuwari, (Beirut: Markaz Dirasat Al-Wihdah Al-Arabiyyah), 1st ed..
• Coicaud Jean-Marc. Legitimacy and politics. A contribution on the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility. Published by the Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge 2002. UK.
• Corm Georges. Arab contemporary political thought: secularist or theologist? Contemporary Arab Affairs. 2016. Vol. 9 Issue 2. pp. 237-251.
• Hallaq, Wael, Al-Dawlah Al-Mustahilah: Al-Islam wa Al-Siyasah wa Mazaq Al-Hadathah Al-Akhlaqi, (In Arabic), (Doha: Al-Markaz Al-Arabi lil-Abhath wa Dirasat Al-Siyasat, 2014), 1st ed..
• Hashimi, Nadir, Al-Islam wa Al-Ilmaniyyah wa Al-Dimuqratiyyah Al-Libraliyyah: Nawha Nazariyyah Dimocratiyyah lil-Mujtamat Al-Muslimah, (In Arabic), Trans. Usamah Ghawji, (Beirut: Al-Shabakah Al-Arabiyyah lil-Abhath wa Al-Nashr, 2017), 1st ed..
• Labeeb Ahmed and Lody Zeitoun. Contemporary Muslim and Arab Governments in Theory and Practice. Journal of Social Affairs .The Sociological Association. 2013. Vol. 30. No. 118. pp. 3-4.
• Lakirwa, Stephan, Zaman Al-Sahwah: Al-Harakat Al-Islamiyyah Al-Muasirah fi Al-Saudiyyah, (In Arabic), Trans. Abdul-Haq Al-Zamuri, (Beirut: Al-Shabakah Al-Arabiyyah lil-Abhath wa Al-Nashr, vol. 1, 2012).
• Mashhadani, Abdul-Karim, Al-Ilmaniyyah wa Atharuha ala Al-Awda Al-Islamiyyah fi Turkiyya, (In Arabic), (Al-Maktabah Al-Duwaliyyah, 1983).
• Munasriyyah, Yusuf, Al-Sira Al-Aydyuluji fi Al-Harakah Al-Wataniyyah Al-Tunusiyyah 1934-1937, (In Arabic), (Sousse, Tunisia: Dar Al-Marif li-Al-Tibah wa Al-Nashr, 2002).
• Rabasa Angel M. and others, U.S. Strategy in the Muslim World After 9/11. Published 2004 by the RAND Corporation. CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PUBLIC POLICY.
• Rabasa Angel, Benard Cheryl, Building moderate Muslim networks Lowell H. Schwartz, Peter Sickle. RAND Corporation. CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PUBLIC POLICY. http://www.rand.org/pubs/ monographs/MG574.html
• Thanyo, Nur Al-Din, Ishkaliyyat Al-Dawlah fi Tarikh Al-Harakah Al-Wataniyyah, (In Arabic), (Beirut: Al-Markaz lil-Abhath wa Dirasat Al-Siyasat, 2015), 1st ed..
• Vali Nasr, “Secularism: Lessons from the Muslim Word”. Daedalus. Vol.132. No.3. On Secularism & Religion. (Summer 2003). Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences.
• Willis, Michael, Al-Tahaddi Al-Islami fi Al-Jazair: Al-Juthur Al-Tarikhiyyah li-Sud Al-Harakah Al Islamiyyah, Trans. Adil KhayrAllah, (Beirut: Sharikat Al-Matbuat li-Al-Tawzi wa Al-Nashr, 1999).
Section
Articles in Arabic