Televised Legal Verdicts: Comparing the Benefits to the Harms
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published
Jan 1, 2013
Qutb Al-Raysouni
Abstract
The aim of this study is to reflect the reality of channel giving legal opinions , its types,clarification the faces of the benefits and evils competing in it, and the likelihood mostly of them in light of the rules of fundamentalism and objectives of shari'a, with refute suspicions that can hover over the legality of this new pattern giving legal opinions, and respond to their opinions with argument emerging binding . The study reached that channel giving legal opinions is ideal means to enable the law of Allah Almighty in the land, and to raise awareness of religious scale capacious, and what come on this fatawa from shariah cautions.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
References
How to Cite
Copied to clipboard
Al-Raysouni, Qutb. 2013. “Televised Legal Verdicts: Comparing the Benefits to the Harms”. Journal of College of Sharia &Amp; Islamic Studies 31 (1). https://journals.qu.edu.qa/index.php/sharia/article/view/170.
Section
Articles in Arabic
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Qutb Al-Raysouni, The Principle: "Specific Harm may be Sustained in Avoidance of General Harm" and it's Current Implementations in Medicine and the Environment , Journal of College of Sharia & Islamic Studies: Vol. 32 No. 1 (2014): 2014
- Qutb Al-Raysouni, The Principle:"The Conduct of the Leader Towards his People is to Correspond with their Interests" , and its Modern Implementations in Environmental Matters , Journal of College of Sharia & Islamic Studies: Vol. 29 No. 1 (2011): 2011
Similar Articles
- Muhammad Modassir Ali, Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics , Journal of College of Sharia & Islamic Studies: Vol. 36 No. 1 (2018): July 2018
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.