Digital Humanities and Qur’ãnic Manuscript Studies: New Perspectives and Challenges for Collaborative Spaces and Plural Views
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Purpose: This article aims at giving an overview of recent research projects carried out by the author in early Qurʾānic manuscripts applying digital tools – in terms of imaging processing, tagging of the text and phylogenetics – thus showing the methodological implications in digitally editing manuscripts and the feasibility of a collaborative space that displays data interpreted by several scholars.
Methodology: In outlining previous and future projects in early Qurʾānic manuscripts, this article is based on and discusses the new epistemological approach offered by digital editing of Qurʾānic manuscript texts by using a mark-up language to encode and share editions. The mark-up and tagging of the text are not only instruments for achieving semiotic tasks but also represent and produce a separate semiotic dimension.
Findings: This research endorses the theory of manuscript editions as a field of intelligently structured possibility that displays hypotheses and allows the reader to experience the manuscript transmission and debatedness of the text. Digital philology and analysis have been applied to some Qurʾānic manuscripts proving the advantages of freeing manuscripts’ edition from the constraints of the linear, circumscribed and static page of the printed text thus offering a solution to the problem of rendering manuscript movement.
Originality: This is a cutting-edge research in digital encoding and pioneer phylogenetic analysis of Qurʾānic manuscript texts. It demonstrates that the digital paradigm can offer a new epistemological approach in Qurʾānic manuscript studies through a platform that admits a great quantity of varied hypotheses and crossing boundaries. This offers a transnational and transcultural system, working with different operating systems in a plurality of transparently displayed data.
Metrics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Digital humanitiesEarly Qurʾānic manuscriptsManuscript CUL Or. 1287Birmingham Qur’ānRadiocarbon datingPhylogeneticsEditing of manuscript textsTagging systemsAnnotating Qurʾānic manuscriptsMarkup language
• Bomprezzi, Giuseppe and Vincenzo Fano, “Considerazioni epistemologiche sulle scienze storico-filologiche”, Studi Urbinati, B - Scienze umane e sociali, 2011, 81: 21-44.
• Buzzetti, Dino, “Digital Editions and Text Processing”, in Kathryn Sutherland and Marilyn Deegan eds., Text Editing, Print and the Digital World (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016) 2nd ed. (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2009): 45-61.
• Buzzetti, Dino, “Digital Representation and the Text Model”, New Literary History, 2002, 33 (1): 61-87.
• Cellard, Éléonore and Sabrina Cimiotti, Codex Amrensis 1. Documenta Coranica, Manuscripta, vol. 1 (Leiden: Brill, 2018).
• Cerquiglini, Bernard, Éloge de la variante: histoire critique de la philologie (Paris: Les Éditions du Seuil, 1989).
• Dresser, P. Quentin, “Radiocarbon dating” in John A. Matthews, ed., Encyclopedia of Environmental Change (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2014): 901. Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446247501.n3188.
• Edmondson, Andrew Charles, Phylogenetic Analysis of the Gospel of John Using BlueBEAR (CCB Seminar 2016), https://www.academia.edu/28678521/Phylogenetic_analysis_of_the_Gospel_of_John_using_BlueBEAR_CCB_Seminar, retrieved on February 10, 2020.
• Edmondson, Andrew Charles, “An Analysis of the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method using Phylogenetics” (Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, UK, 2019).
• Fedeli, Alba, “Early Qur’ānic Manuscripts, their Text, and the Alphonse Mingana Papers Held in the Department of Special Collections of the University of Birmingham” (Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, UK, 2015).
• Fedeli, Alba, “The Digitization Project of the Qur’ānic Palimpsest, MS Cambridge University Library Or. 1287, and the Verification of the Mingana-Lewis Edition: Where is salām?”, Journal of Islamic Manuscripts, 2011, 2 (1): 100-117.
• Fiormonte, Domenico, Scrittura e filologia nell’era digitale (Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2003).
• Fraistat, Neil and Julia Flanders, “Introduction” in Neil Fraistat and Julia Flanders eds., The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): 1-15.
• Ginzburg, Carlo, “Spie, Radici di un paradigma scientifico” in Aldo Gargani ed., Crisi della ragione (Torino: Einaudi, 1979).
• Grohmann, Adolf, “The Problem of Dating Early Qurʾāns”, Der Islam, 1958, 33: 213-231.
• Higham, T. F. G., C. Bronk Ramsey, D. Chivall, J. Graystone, D. Baker, E. Henderson and P. Ditchfield, “Radiocarbon Dates from the Oxford AMS System: Archaeometry Datelist 36”, Archaeometry, 2018, 60 (3): 628-640.
• Hilali, Asma, The Sanaa Palimpsest. The Transmission of the Qur'an in the First Centuries AH (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).
• Houghton, Hugh A.G., “The Electronic Scriptorium: Markup for New Testament Manuscripts” in Claire Clivaz, David Hamidovic and Andrew Gregory, eds., Digital Humanities in Biblical, Early Jewish and Early Christian Studies (Leiden: Brill, 2014): 31-60.
• Houghton, Hugh A.G. and Catherine J. Smith, “Digital Editing and the Greek New Testament” in Claire Clivaz, Paul Dilley and David Hamidović eds., Ancient Worlds in Digital Culture (Leiden: Brill, 2016): 110-127.
• Houghton, Hugh A.G., Catherine J. Smith and Martin Sievers, “The Workspace for Collaborative Editing” in Digital Humanities 2014 Conference Abstracts, EPFL–UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 8–12 July 2014.
• Howe, Christopher J. and Heather F. Windram, “Phylomemetics—Evolutionary Analysis beyond the Gene”, PLoS Biology, 9 (5), 2011, e1001069. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001069, retrieved on February 10, 2020.
• Maas, Philipp A., “Computer Aided Stemmatics — The Case of Fifty-Two Text Versions of Carakasaṃhitā Vimānasthāna 8.67-157”, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens / Vienna Journal of South Asian Studies, (Text Genealogy, Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique), 2009-2010, 52/53: 63-119.
• Marx, Michael Josef and Tobia J. Jocham, “Zu den Dattierungen von Koranhandschriften durch die 14C-Methode”, Frankfurter Zeitschrift für Islamisch-Theologische Studien, (Koranforschung. Verortung und Hermeneutik), 2015, 2: 9-43.
• Marx, Michael Josef and Tobias J. Jocham, “Radiocarbon (14C) Dating of Qur’ān Manuscripts” in Andreas Kaplony – Michael Marx eds., Qur’ān Quotations Preserved on Papyrus Documents, 7th-10th Centuries and the Problem of Carbon Dating Early Qur’āns (Leiden: Brill, 2019): 188-221.
• McGann, Jerome, “Why Digital Textual Scholarship Matters; Or, Philology in a New Key”. Coda in Neil Fraistat and Julia Flanders eds., The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013): 274-288.
• Mingana, Alphonse and Agnes Smith Lewis, Leaves from Three Ancient Qurâns Possibly pre-‘Othmânic with a List of their Variants (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1914).
• Puin, Elisabeth, “Ein früher Koranpalimpsest aus Ṣan‘ā’ (DAM 01-27.1)” in Markus Groβ – Karl-Heinz Ohlig, eds., Schlaglichter. Die beiden ersten islamischen Jahrhunderte (Berlin: Verlag Hans Schiler, 2008): 461-493.
• Puin, Elisabeth, “Ein früher Koranpalimpsest aus Ṣan‘ā’ (DAM 01-27.1). Teil II” in Markus Groβ – Karl-Heinz Ohlig, eds., Vom Koran zum Islam: Schriften zur Frühen Islamgeschichte und zum Koran (Berlin: Verlag Hans Schiler, 2009): 523-581.
• Puin, Elisabeth, “Ein früher Koranpalimpsest aus Ṣan‘ā’ (DAM 01-27.1). Teil III: Ein nicht-‘uṯmānischer Koran” in Markus Groβ – Karl-Heinz Ohlig, eds., Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion I. Von der koranischen Bewegung zum Frühislam (Berlin: Verlag Hans Schiler, 2010): 233-305.
• Puin, Elisabeth, “Ein früher Koranpalimpsest aus Ṣan‘ā’ (DAM 01-27.1). Teil IV: Die scriptio inferior auf den Blättern 17, 18 und 19 der Handschrift DAM 01-27.1 (Sure 9:106-Ende, dann 19:1-67 und weiter)” in Markus Groβ – Karl-Heinz Ohlig, eds., Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion II. Von der koranischen Bewegung zum Frühislam (Berlin: Verlag Hans Schiler, 2011): 311-402.
• Puin, Elisabeth, “Ein früher Koranpalimpsest aus Ṣan‘ā’ (DAM 01-27.1). Teil V: Die scriptio inferior auf den Blättern 14 and 15 sowie Auseinandersetzung mit den Thesen und der Edition des Koranpalimpsests von Behnam Sadeghi und Mohsen Goudarzi” in Markus Groβ – Karl-Heinz Ohlig, eds., Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion III. Die heilige Stadt Mekka – eine literarische Fiktion (Berlin: Verlag Hans Schiler, 2014): 477-618.
• Robinson, Peter M.W. and Robert J. O'Hara, “Report on the Textual Criticism Challenge 1991”, Bryn Mawr Classical Review, 1992, 3: 331–337.
• Sadan, Joseph, “Genizah and Genizah-like Practices in Islamic and Jewish Traditions”, Bibliotheca Orientalis, 1986, 43: 36–58.
• Sadeghi, Benham and Mohsen Goudarzi, “Ṣan‘ā’ 1 and the Origins of the Qur’ān”, Der Islam, 2012, 87: 1-129.
• Sahle, Patrick, “What is a Scholarly Digital Edition?” in Matthew James Driscoll and Elena Pierazzo eds., Digital Scholarly Editing. Theories and Practices (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2016): 19-39.
• Schmidt, Desmond and Robert Colomb, “A data structure for representing multi-version texts online”, International Journal of Human - Computer Studies, 2009, 67 (6): 497-514.
• Schmidt, Desmond, “The role of markup in the digital humanities”, Historical social research, 2012, 37 (3): 125-146.
• Segre, Cesare, Semiotica filologica. Testo e modelli culturali (Torino: Einaudi, 1979).
• Tomasi, Francesca, Metodologie informatiche e discipline umanistiche (Roma: Carocci editore, 2008).