The application of the historical-critical method to the Qur’an is sometimes viewed as an imperialist attempt to undermine Islamic belief. This view, however, fails to sufficiently consider that the same method has also been applied to the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament. The historical-critical study of the Qur’an cannot, therefore, be accurately described as a targeted assault on Islam in particular. There can, nonetheless, be no doubt that there are significant methodological differences between a historical-critical approach to the Qur’an and premodern Islamic approaches. Additionally, the Western study of the Qur’an has yielded results that are apt to be of interest to scholars based in the Islamic world, even to those who might not be prepared to accept the historical-critical approach in its entirety. These results include a close comparison between Qur’anic narrative, on the one hand, and ancient Jewish and Christian traditions in Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew, on the other. Such a comparison permits a deepened understanding of the specificity of Qur’anic doctrine against its contemporary intellectual background. Moreover, the last few decades have witnessed a strong interest among Western scholars in the literary and rhetorical structure of the Qur’an. There is increasing awareness that the literary and rhetorical analysis of the Qur’an, even if practiced from a historical-critical perspective, can significantly benefit from Islamic scholarship.
Historical-critical method Western Scholarship on the Qur’an hermeneutics ancient Jewish and Christian traditions literary and rhetorical structure of the Qur’an
• Bannister, Andrew G. An Oral-Formulaic Study of the Qur’an. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2014.
• Davidson, Herbert A. Moses Maimonides: The Man and His Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
• Farrin, Raymond. Structure and Qur’anic Interpretation: A Study of Symmetry and Coherence in Islam’s Holy Text. Ashland: White Cloud Press, 2014.
• Griffith, Sidney. “Christian Lore and the Arabic Qurʾān: The Companions of the Cave in Sūrat al-Kahf and in Syriac Christian Tradition.” In The Qurʾān in its Historical Context, edited by Gabriel S. Reynolds, 109–137. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.
• Iṣlāḥī, Amīn Aḥsan. Tadabbur-e Qurʾān: Pondering over the Qurʾān. Vols. 1 and 2. Translated by Mohammad Saleem Kayani. Islamic Book Trust: Petaling Jaya, 2007 and 2015.
• Mir, Mustansir. Coherence in the Qurʾān: A Study of Iṣlāḥī’s Concept of Naẓm in Tadabbur-i Qurʾān, Indianapolis: American Trust Publications, 1986.
• Mir, Mustansir. “The Sūra as a Unity: A Twentieth Century Development in Qurʾān Exegesis.” In Approaches to the Qurʾān, edited by G. R. Hawting and Abdul-Kader A. Shareef, 211–224. London: Routledge, 1993.
• Mir, Mustansir. “Continuity, Context, and Coherence in the Qurʾān: A Brief Review of the Idea of Naẓm in Tafsīr Literature.” Al-Bayān 11, no. 2 (2013): 15–29.
• Neuwirth, Angelika. Studien zur Komposition der mekkanischen Suren. Second edition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.
• al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Tafsīr al-Fakhr al-Rāzī al-mushtahir bi-l-Tafsīr al-kabīr wa-Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. 32 vols., (in Arabic), Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1981/1401 AH.
• Reda, Nevin. The al-Baqara Crescendo: Understanding the Qurʾan’s Style, Narrative Structure, and Running Themes. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017.
• Robinson, Neal. Discovering the Qur’an: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. Second edition. London: SCM Press, 2003.
• Salih, Walid A. In Defense of the Bible: A Critical Edition and an Introduction to al-Biqāʿī’s Bible Treatise. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
• Sinai, Nicolai. “Historical-Critical Readings of Abrahamic Scriptures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Abrahamic Religions, edited by Adam Silverstein and Guy Stroumsa, 209–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
• Sinai, Nicolai. “Gottes Wort und menschliche Deutung: Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von islamischer Schriftauslegung und historischer Kritik.” In Deutung des Wortes – Deutung der Welt im Gespräch zwischen Islam und Christentum, edited by Andreas Feldtkeller and Notger Slenczka, 151–171. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2015.
• Sinai, Nicolai. “Reading Sūrat al-Anʿām with Muḥammad Rashīd Riḍā and Sayyid Quṭb.” In Reclaiming Islamic Tradition: Modern Interpretations of the Classical Heritage, edited by Elisabeth Kendall and Ahmad Khan, 136–159. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
• Sinai, Nicolai. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
• Sinai, Nicolai. “Two Types of Inner-Qurʾānic Interpretation.” In Exegetical Crossroads: Understanding Scripture in Judaism, Christianity and Islam in the Pre-Modern Orient, edited by Georges Tamer et al., 253–288. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.
• Sinai, Nicolai. “Pharaoh’s Submission to God in the Qur’an and in Rabbinic Literature: A Case Study in Qur’anic Intertextuality.” In The Qur’an’s Reformation of Judaism and Christianity, edited by Holger Zellentin, 235–260. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.
• al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-Itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. (in Arabic), Medina: Majmaʿ al-Malik Fahd li-Ṭibāʿat al-Muṣḥaf al-Sharīf, 1426 AH.
• al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Marāṣid al-maṭāliʿ fī tanāsub al-maqāṭiʿ wa-l-maṭāliʿ. (in Arabic), Riyadh: Maktabat Dār al-Minhāj, 1426 AH.
• Witztum, Joseph. “Variant Traditions, Relative Chronology, and the Study of Intra-Quranic Parallels.” In Islamic Cultures, Islamic Contexts: Essays in Honor of Professor Patricia Crone, edited by Behnam Sadeghi, Asad Q. Ahmed, Adam Silverstein, and Robert Hoyland, 1–50. Leiden: Brill, 2014.
• Zahniser, A. H. Mathias. “Sūra as Guidance and Exhortation: The Composition of Sūrat al-Nisāʾ.” In Humanism, Culture, and Language in the Near East: Studies in Honor of Georg Krotkoff, edited by Asma Afsaruddin and A. H. Mathias Zahniser, 71–85. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1997.
• Zahniser, A. H. Mathias. “Major Transitions and Thematic Borders in Two Long Sūras: al-Baqara and al-Nisāʾ.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qurʾān, edited by Issa J. Boullata, 26–55. Richmond: Curzon, 2000.