Maher M. Abu-Hilal Mohammad Al-Qadahat Sulaiman Al-Maamari

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the structure of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and explore if the structure is invariant across school students (n=365) and university students (n=119). Previous research has shown that self-esteem so as other personality traits are developmental in nature; and self-esteem becomes more differentiated and realistic with age. Two samples responded to RSES which has 10 items half of which was written in the positive format and the other half in negative format. RSES showed reasonable internal consistency, especially among university students. Also, the scale produced a reasonable structure among both groups as the items measured the factor substantially. Item loadings were invariant across the two groups. However, other parameters (intercepts, residuals and correlations among residuals) were not invariant indicating that the items measured the trait equally valid for school and university students. However, the level of self-esteem as indicated by item scores was not invariant as school children scored higher than university students in most of the items. The results imply that using negative items has an effect on both the structure and magnitude of self-esteem. Scale developers and users may need to be cautioned when they interpret the resultant scores of scales with positive and negative items.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

self-steem
factor structure
wording style
school students
university students
oman

References
جرادات، عبد الكريم. (2006). العلاقة بين تقدير الذات والاتجاهات اللاعقلانية لدى الطلبة الجامعيين. المجلة الأردنية في العلوم التربوية، 2(3)، 143-153.
الشايب، عبد الحافظ. (2010). أثر طريقة صياغة فقرات الصورة المعربة لمقياس روزنبرغ لتقدير الذات في البناء العاملي للمقياس. المجلة الدولية للأبحاث التربوية، 28، 1-20.


Abu-Hilal, M. & Bahri, T. (2000). Self-concept: The generalizability of research on SDQ, Marsh/Shavelson, and I/E frame of reference model to the United Arab Emirates students. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 309-322.
Abu-Hilal, M., Abdel Fattah, F., Shumrani, S., Abduljabbar, A. S. & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Construct validity of self-concept in TIMSS's student background questionnaire: a test of separation and conflation of cognitive and affective dimensions of self-concept among Saudi 8th graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(4), 1201-1220. Doi: 10.1007/s10212-012-01621.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49–87.
Bankston, C. L., III, & Zhou, M. (2002). Being well vs. doing well: self-esteem and school performance among immigrant racial and ethnic groups. International Migration Review, 36(2), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00086.x
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121-149. doi: 10.1177/0748175610373459
DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440–464.
Gnambs, T., & Schroeders, U. (2017). Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Assessment, 1-15. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1073191117746503?journalCode=asma
Gnambs, T., Scharl, A. & Schroeders, U. (2018). The Structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000317
Horan, P. M., DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 435–455. DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_6
Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait–correlated method and correlated uniqueness models of multitrait–multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228–244.
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: Substantively meaningful distinction or artifacts? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819.
Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait–multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and application (pp. 177–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., & Nagengast, B. (2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 366–381.
McKay, M., Boduszek, D., & Harvey, S. (2014). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A bifactor answer to two-factor question? Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 654-660. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2014.923436
Michaelides, M. P., Koutsogiorgi, C., & Panayiotou, G. (2016). Method effects on an adaptation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Greek and the role of personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 178-188, DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089248
Pullmann, H., & Allik, J. (2000). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: its dimensionality, stability and personality correlates in Estonian. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 701-715. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.017
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 623–642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623
Tomás, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84–98. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540120
Triandis, H. C. (2001). Modern educational needs cross-cultural psychology. In D. McInerney & S. V. Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural motivation and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 1–13). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Wang, J., Siegal, H. A., Falck, R. S., & Carlson, R. G. (2001). Factorial structure of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale among crack-cocaine drug users. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 275–286.
Wu, C.-H. (2008). An examination of the wording effect in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among culturally Chinese people. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 535–551. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.535-552.
How to Cite
Abu-Hilal , Maher M., Mohammad Al-Qadahat, and Sulaiman Al-Maamari. 2021. “The Factor Structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Among School Students and University Students in Oman”. Journal of Educational Sciences 17 (17). https://doi.org/10.29117/jes.2021.0047.
Section
Articles in Arabic