Soft Power and the 2022 World Cup in Qatar: Learning from Experiences of Past Mega-Sporting Event Hosts
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The experiences of past hosts to mega sporting events like the Olympics, or FIFA World Cup games show that there are numerous ways in which countries can be both empowered or disempowered through their pursuit of soft power. Through a selective literature review, this paper uses the relevant soft power experiences of six countries who have hosted either the World Cup or Olympic Games from 2008. The cases include China (Beijing 2008 Olympics), South Africa (2010 World Cup), United Kingdom (London 2012 Olympics), Brazil (2014 World Cup and Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympics), Russia (Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics, and 2018 World Cup), and Japan (Tokyo 2020 Olympics). The paper then considers Qatar’s 2022 World Cup with an angle on applying and adapting the experiences of past hosts to understand the soft empowerment or disempowerment that Qatar will likely face as a result of hosting the games. The numerous international concerns over the situation with migrant workers in Qatar, and the Islamic and cultural norms that are alien to Western audiences, will continue to challenge Qatar’s image management and branding measures. Nevertheless, the commitment to holding the most eco-friendly event, continuous presence on international soccer fields through sponsorships, ownerships, and winning championships, in addition to actively seeking to enhance and alleviate the status of the country on the global stage will help Doha in its soft empowerment endeavors in the period before and during the event. Its pledge and dedication to keeping a long-lasting legacy after December 2022 will also help the State in the post-event phase of soft empowerment.
Metrics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Soft PowerMega-Sporting EventsWorld CupOlympic GamesQatarSports Diplomacy
Brannagan, P.M. and Giulianotti, R., Soft Power and Soft Disempowerment: Qatar, Global Sport and football’s 2022 World Cup finals, Leisure Studies, Vol. 34, No. 6, (2015): pp. 703-719.
Buarque, Daniel. One Country, Two Cups- The International Image of Brazil in 1950 and in 2014: A Study of the Reputation and the Identity of Brazil as Projected by the International Media During the Two FIFA World Cups in the Country. International Journal of Communication Vol. 9 (2015): pp. 1300-1318.
Burchell, Kenzie; O’Loughlin, Ben; Gillespie, Marie; and McAvoy, Eva Nieto. Soft power and its audiences: Tweeting the Olympics from London 2012 to Sochi 2014. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies Vol. 12, No. 1 (May 2015): pp. 413-437.
Desaia, Ashwin, and Vahed, Goolam. World Cup 2010: Africa’s turn or the turn on Africa? Soccer & Society Vol. 11, No. 1 (January–March 2010): pp. 154–167.
Dubber, John. Playing the Game: The soft power of sport. British Council. October 2015.
Eisenstadt, S. N. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus Vol. 129, No. 1 (2000): pp. 1-29.
Giulianotti, Richard. The Beijing 2008 Olympics: Examining the Interrelations of China, Globalization, and Soft Power. European Review Vol. 23, No. 2 (May 2015): pp. 286-296.
Grix, Jonathan and Kramareva, Nina. The Sochi Winter Olympics and Russia’s unique soft power strategy. Sport in Society (2015), pp. 1-15.
Grix, Jonathan, and Houlihan, Barrie. Sports Mega-Events as Part of a Nation’s Soft Power Strategy: The Cases of Germany (2006) and the UK (2012). The British Journal of Politics and International Relations Vol. 16 (2014): pp. 572-596.
Lee, Kwang-Hoon and Chappelet. Jean-Loup. Faster, Higher, “Softly” Stronger: The Impact of Soft Power on the Choice of Olympic Host Cities. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies Vol. 27, No. 3 (2012): pp. 47-71.
Leheny, David. The Contents of Power: Narratives and Soft Power in the Olympic Games Opening Ceremonies. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, No. 294 (June 2019).
Martin, Alex. Can Tokyo's soft power push ensure a positive Olympic legacy? The Japan Times. January 2, 2020.
Morales, D. E. (2013). Inside the BRIC: Analysis of the Semiperipheral Character of Brazil, Russia, India and China. Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations Vol. 2, No. 4, (2013), pp. 141-173.
Murakami, Sakura. Hashimoto resigns from cabinet to become head of Tokyo Olympic committee. Japan Today. Feb. 18, 2021.
Nye, Joseph. Soft Power and Beijing Olympics. Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center. August 24, 2008.
Nye, Joseph. Soft Power. Foreign Policy, No. 80 (Autumn 1990): pp. 153-171.
Panja, Tariq, and Draper, Kevin. U.S. Says FIFA Officials Were Bribed to Award World Cups to Russia and Qatar. The New York Times. April 6, 2020.
Pellitteri, Marco. Japan’s Soft Power and “Grand Fictions” in Global Venues. Kritika Kultura, Vol. 32 (2019): pp. 453-481.
Pulleiro, Carlos. The International Legacy of Sports Mega-events in Brazil: Political and Economic Lessons for the Semi-peripheral Countries. Papel Politico Vol. 25, (June 29 2020): pp. 1-17.
Schausteck de Almeida, Bárbara; Júnior, Wanderley Marchi; and Pikec, Elizabeth. The 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games and Brazil’s soft power. Contemporary Social Science Vol. 9, No. 2 (2014): pp. 271–283.
Soares e Castro, Andreia. “The 2018 FIFA World Cup: The Gains and Constraints of Russia’s Soft Power of Attraction Through Football and Sports. Rising Powers Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2018): pp. 17-37.
Swart, K., & Bob, U. The seductive discourse of development: The Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 7, (2004): pp. 1311-1324.
Zhongying, Pang. The Beijing Olympics and China’s Soft Power. The Brookings Institution. September 4, 2008.
World Muslim body lends support to Qatar over 2022 World Cup. Reuters. June 18, 2015.