Trade Liberalization and Economic Diversification: A Dynamic CGE Model for The Economy of Qatar
Abstract
This paper develops a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for Qatar with the view of getting some insights into the working of this a small open oil dependent economy. The model addresses three important issues that will determine the future path of Qatar economy. First, the issue of the oil price and its impact on the economy. Second, the issue of economic diversification away from oil. Third, the issue of trade liberalization in view of WTO agreement, the custom union within the GCC block, the planned GCC bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) with the EU and the US and the Greater Arab FTA. The impact of oil is simulated by an increase in the world price of oil. Economic diversification is simulated by an introduction of a value added tax (VAT) that diversifies government revenue and makes it less dependent on oil. Trade liberalization is simulated by a reduction of the external import tariff. The model results indicate that the increase of the price of oil and trade liberalization lead to a substantial favorable outcome in term of both GDP and wealth. On the contrary, the introduction of the VAT has an adverse impact on both GDP and wealth. As the aim of the VAT is to make the governments less dependent on oil, it turns out that the VAT decreases the tax base as it leads to the shrinking of the economy and, overall, the government collects even less taxes. This paper is the first attempt of its kind to address these issues in a dynamic general equilibrium context for Qatar and the Arab Gulf region. In addition, the data collected to calibrate the model provides a consistent set of data for the Qatar economy that is not being developed before.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
Trade Liberalization
References
• Andersen, L. and R. Faris (2002). Natural gas and income distribution in Bolivia. Andean Competitiveness Project Working Papers.
• Annabi, N. and T. Rajhi (2001). Dynamics of trade liberalization: An intertemporal com-putable general equilibrium model applied to Tunisia. Paper presented at the EcoMod Conference 2001 in Brussels.
• Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Raman (1998). Gams; A Userʼs Guide. San Francisco: The ScientificPress.
• Bugarin, M., R. de Goes Ellery Jr., V. Silva, and M. Muinhos (2003). Steady state analysis of an open economy general equilibrium model for Brazil. Department of Economics Working Paper 290. University of Brasilia.
• Devarajan, S. and S. Go (1998). The simplest dynamic general-equilibrium model of an open economy. Journal of Policy Modeling 20 (6), 677–714.
• Diao, X., E.Yeldan, and T. Roe (1998). A simple dynamic applied general equilibrium model of a small open economy: Transitional dynamics and trade policy. Journal of economic development 23 (1), 77–101.
• Feraboli, O. (2003). A dynamic analysis of Jordanʼs trade liberalization. Paper presented at the EcoMod conference 2003 in Istanbul .
• Hassanain, K. (2002). A CGE model for the UAE. Paper presented at ”The third annual research conference” at Al Ain University, UAE. April 30th - May 1st 2002
• Jean-Marc, P. (2006). The use of CGE models for the trade policies analysis and their impact on poverty: criticisms and proposals for improvements Model. Working Paper No. 9602, CEDERS, University of Economics, Aix-Marseille II.
• Mabugu, R. (2003). Fiscal policy design in South Africa: An intertemporal CGE model with perfect foresight. Mimeo university of Pretoria.
• Mai, Y., P. Adams, M. Fan, R. Li and Z. Zheng (2005). Modelling the Potential Benefits of an Australia-China Free Trade Agreement. Working Paper No. G-153, October 2005. Centre for Policy Studies, Monash University.
• Mai, Y. and P. Adams (2005). Trade Liberalization Scenarios for Wool under an Australia-China Free Trade Agreement. Working Paper No. G-156, October 2005. Centre for Policy Studies, Monash University.
• Mercenier, J. and P. Michel (1994a). A criterion for time aggregation in intertemporal dynamic models. Mathematical Programming 64, 179–197.
• Mercenier, J. and P. Michel (1994b). Discrete-time-finite horizon approximation of infinite horizon optimization problems with steady-state invariance. Econometrica 3, 635–656.
• Piazolo, D. (1999). Quantifying the consequences of Polandʼs membership in the European Union. Paper presented at European Trade Study Group Inaugural Conference, Rotterdam, 24-26 September 1999 .
• Raihan, S. (2004). Dynamics of trade liberalisation: An inter-temporal computable general equilibrium model applied to Bangladesh. Mimeo, University of Manchester.
• Annabi, N. and T. Rajhi (2001). Dynamics of trade liberalization: An intertemporal com-putable general equilibrium model applied to Tunisia. Paper presented at the EcoMod Conference 2001 in Brussels.
• Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Raman (1998). Gams; A Userʼs Guide. San Francisco: The ScientificPress.
• Bugarin, M., R. de Goes Ellery Jr., V. Silva, and M. Muinhos (2003). Steady state analysis of an open economy general equilibrium model for Brazil. Department of Economics Working Paper 290. University of Brasilia.
• Devarajan, S. and S. Go (1998). The simplest dynamic general-equilibrium model of an open economy. Journal of Policy Modeling 20 (6), 677–714.
• Diao, X., E.Yeldan, and T. Roe (1998). A simple dynamic applied general equilibrium model of a small open economy: Transitional dynamics and trade policy. Journal of economic development 23 (1), 77–101.
• Feraboli, O. (2003). A dynamic analysis of Jordanʼs trade liberalization. Paper presented at the EcoMod conference 2003 in Istanbul .
• Hassanain, K. (2002). A CGE model for the UAE. Paper presented at ”The third annual research conference” at Al Ain University, UAE. April 30th - May 1st 2002
• Jean-Marc, P. (2006). The use of CGE models for the trade policies analysis and their impact on poverty: criticisms and proposals for improvements Model. Working Paper No. 9602, CEDERS, University of Economics, Aix-Marseille II.
• Mabugu, R. (2003). Fiscal policy design in South Africa: An intertemporal CGE model with perfect foresight. Mimeo university of Pretoria.
• Mai, Y., P. Adams, M. Fan, R. Li and Z. Zheng (2005). Modelling the Potential Benefits of an Australia-China Free Trade Agreement. Working Paper No. G-153, October 2005. Centre for Policy Studies, Monash University.
• Mai, Y. and P. Adams (2005). Trade Liberalization Scenarios for Wool under an Australia-China Free Trade Agreement. Working Paper No. G-156, October 2005. Centre for Policy Studies, Monash University.
• Mercenier, J. and P. Michel (1994a). A criterion for time aggregation in intertemporal dynamic models. Mathematical Programming 64, 179–197.
• Mercenier, J. and P. Michel (1994b). Discrete-time-finite horizon approximation of infinite horizon optimization problems with steady-state invariance. Econometrica 3, 635–656.
• Piazolo, D. (1999). Quantifying the consequences of Polandʼs membership in the European Union. Paper presented at European Trade Study Group Inaugural Conference, Rotterdam, 24-26 September 1999 .
• Raihan, S. (2004). Dynamics of trade liberalisation: An inter-temporal computable general equilibrium model applied to Bangladesh. Mimeo, University of Manchester.
How to Cite
Vellinga, Nico, and Eisa AbdelGalil. 2007. “Trade Liberalization and Economic Diversification: A Dynamic CGE Model for The Economy of Qatar”. Studies in Business and Economics 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.29117/sbe.2007.0034.
Section
Articles