Market Competitiveness And Consumer Acceptability Of Polish Manufactured And Agricultural Exports To African Countries: A Comparative Analysis
Abstract
Over time, Africa has been regarded as a major destination for manufactured (industrial) goods from the United States and Europe, thus creating huge competition for Polish export goods in the African markets. But, there is the need to know the level of competitiveness, the comparative advantages and the import parity prices of these export goods in the African markets so that their performance and acceptance could be measured, especially, among the consumers. Consumer acceptability of goods is often hinged on the perception of quality, price competitiveness, and derived satisfaction from their consumption, among other factors. Specifically, the objectives of this study were to determine the level of market competitiveness for the selected Polish manufactured and agricultural exports in African markets. It also examined the level of comparative advantage and consumer (market) acceptability of Polish goods exported to African markets. Twenty–year secondary data on Africa's major manufactured and agricultural imports (2005-2022) was used and trade competitiveness index measurements, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index, Import Parity Price (IPP) Analysis and descriptive statistics were used.
Findings showed that there was a strong competitiveness for agricultural exports from Poland to Ghana while Egypt had strong export trade competitiveness in mineral fuels, lubricants, boilers, machinery and appliances, vehicles, aircraft parts and vessels with Warsaw. The Revealed Comparative Advantage indices indicated that Poland had the highest export trade relations with Nigeria in live animals and animal products and least in foodstuffs and beverages. Overall, Poland had the best bilateral trade relations with the Republic of South Africa and the worst with Kenya. Similarly, foodstuffs and beverages, with the highest total value of $353,498.0 were exported by Poland to the Egyptian market while the least quantity of the items, valued at $14,550.4 million, were exported to the Kenyan market within the same period. Nigeria had impressive import parity prices (IPP) in maize, frozen chicken, turkey, and commercial boiler while South Africa and Egypt had better IPP in rye, and frozen turkey respectively. Generally, all the six African trade partners were favoured in the commercial boilers exchange with Warsaw. In conclusion, the Polish government has realized that the African markets are veritable business destinations for its products in recent times. To fully maximize and reap the benefits of these markets therefore, there is the need to minimize the artificial trade barriers, and bureaucracies in trading, and ensure the provision of moderate grants to support African governments' export drives with Warsaw. It therefore recommended that Poland should invest more in the export of live animals and animal products to Nigeria. Such investment could be extended to commercial animal ranching under an intensive management system with a modern agribusiness management touch and supply value chain which can create huge job opportunities and increased household incomes in Nigeria and thus jack up the foreign exchange earnings of Poland.
Metrics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
African marketsConsumer AcceptabilityImport Parity PriceExport tradeComparative AdvantageTrade CompetitivenessPoland
• Balassa, B. (1965), Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33: 99-123.
• Balassa, B. (1979): The changing pattern of comparative advantage in manufactured goods. In Review of Economic Statistics,1979,61(2):259-266.
• Cantwell, J. (2005): Innovation and competitiveness. In the Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J.Fagerberg, D.C.Mowery and R.R.Nelson (ed.)Oxford University Press,2005.541-567.ISBN:978-01-99286-80-5
• Chandran, S (2010): Trade Complementarity and Similarity Between India and ASEAN Countries in the Context of RTA. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA). Online at http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/29279.
• Fagerberg, J.(1996): Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Policy.12(3):39-51.DOI:10.1093/oxrep/12.3.39.
• Fukunish, T.(2004): International Competitiveness of Manufacturing Firms in sub-Saharan Africa. Discussion paper No. 2. Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), Jetro 3-2-2, Wakaba, M Sharma- ku, Chiba- shi Chiba 261-8545, Japan.p.27.
• Gospodarki,M. (2011b): Trade with Lithuania [online]. Available on the the Internet: http://www.mg.gov.pl/Wspolpraca+z+zagranica/W
• Grzegorczyk,M. (2015): Poland starts to conquer African markets. Obserwator finansowy.pl
• Grzegorzewska, E., Sedliacikova, M., Drabek and Behun, M. (2020): Evaluating the international competitiveness of Polish furniture manufacturing industry in comparison to the selected EU countries. ACTA Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen, 62 (2):149-164,2020.Zvolen,Tecknicka univerzita vo Zvolene.DOI:10.17423/afx.2020.62.2.14.pp.149-156
• Jagdambe, S. (2016): Analysis of Revealed Comparative Advantage in Export of India's Agricultural Products. Working Paper 372. ISBN 978-81-7791-228-9. The Institute for Social and Economic Change. Bangalore, India.
• Kraujalis, Š. and Snieška, V. (2000): Changing Competition in the Lithuanian Banking Market and its Impact on Investment Activities. //Engineering Economics, 2000, No. 4 (19).
• Krugman, P.R. and M.Obstfeld (2005), International Economics: Theory and Policy, 6th edition. Chapter 8-9.
• Mabiso, A.(2008): Import/Export Parity Price Analysis. FEWS NET Markets Guidance, No 1. May 2008.FEWS NET Washington, USA. pp1-28
• Milica C. and Marija P. (2017): The Analysis of Agricultural Products Export Competitiveness of The Republic of Serbia Based on The RCA Index. ECONOMIC Themes. 55(3): 399-420 DOI 10.1515/themes-2017-0022.
• Nigeria's Export Promotion Council, NEPC (2012): Quarterly Publications.Pp15-22
• Reda C., Sandesh D., Xiangming F., Gonzalez-Garcia, J.,
• Miguel M., Yuanchen Y., Mustafa Y., and Jung Eun Y.,(2020 ): Competition, Competitiveness and Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa.International Monetary Fund (IMF).Working Paper 20/30.p.48
• Rossella D.M.,Cavella,C., Torrieri,E and Masi,P. (2007) : Consumer Acceptability of Vegetable soups.Journal of Sensory Studies.Volume 22.Issue 1.Pp.81-98.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00097.X
• Shinoj, P. and V Mathur (2008): Comparative Advantage of India in Agricultural Exports vis-à-vis Asia: A Post-reforms Analysis. Agriculture Economics Research Review, 21: 60-66.
• Snieška, V. and Šliburytė, L. (2000): Competition research and competitiveness management information system maintenance. //Engineering Economics, 2000, No. 2 (17).
• Stanislaw K. and Mariola K. (2020): Agricultural sector in the economy of Poland in 1950-2020.WBJAERD, Vol.2, No.2(69-152). DOI:10.5937/WBJAE2002077K.
• Szymanik, E. (2012): The competitiveness of the export from Poland to the Baltic countries. Cracow University of Economics,Rakowiscka 21,31-510,Krakow,Poland.7th International Scientific Conference, Business and Management 2012.
• Trading Economics (2020): Online Database. Website: https://tradingeconomics.com
• United Nations,UN (2022): International Trade Statistics Yearbook. Volume 1. Trade by Country. The United Nations, New York, 2022.ST/ESA/STAT/SER.G/70 VOL.1. pp.280-282.
• Wei, R., (2005): Analysis of China's Vegetable Trade Status and Influencing Factors. MSc Thesis. China Agricultural University, Beijing (in Chinese).
• Yulin L. (2021): Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural sustainability in China. Institute of Education and Science in Economics, Management, and International Business, National.
• World Economic Forum (2004): The Global Competitiveness Report 2004–2005, Basingstoke 2004, pp. 64–5
• World Integrated Trade Solution (2022): African Export-Import Trade Volumes with Poland in 2022 (US$,000)