Meshari O. Al-Hajri


Although auditor choice has been studied extensively in the audit literature,
research examining this issue in developing markets has been scarce thus far. The
objective of this study is to investigate the impact of corporate governance (CG)
on external auditor choice in the context of the small Kuwaiti emerging market.
Specifically, the present study uses both a survey and hand-collected 2012 fiscalyear
data pertinent to 53 Kuwaiti listed companies to examine whether firm’s
auditor choice is influenced by company’s board size, board independence,
directors’ shareholdings, Audit Committee (AC) size, and/or AC independence.
Using a logistic regression model, the study’s results reveal evidence of a
meaningful relation between auditor choice and AC size, company’s leverage,
and company’s belonging to the finance sector. These findings could be useful to
market regulators and corporate executives, especially in Kuwait, in improving
CG practices within corporations. The research findings should also be of value to
international researchers interested in carrying out related research.


Metrics Loading ...



Corporate governance
audit committee
audit independence
auditor choice
developing markets

• Abbott, L. Parker, S., Peters, G. and Raghunandan, K. (2003), “The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 22, pp. 17-32.
• Abbott, L., Parker, S. and Peters, G. (2004), “Audit committee characteristics and restatements”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 23, No.1, pp. 69-87.
• Adams, R. and Mehran, H. (2003), “Is corporate governance different for bank holding companies?”, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 123-142.
• Aguilera, R. (2005), “Corporate Governance and Director Accountability: an Institutional Comparative Perspective”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 16,pp. S39-S53.
• Al-Ajmi, J. (2009), “Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: evidence from Bahrain”, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 64-74.
• Alfraih, M/ (2017), “Choosing an external auditor: does the composition of boards of directors matter?”, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 394-412.
• Alfaraih, M., Al Anezi, F. and Almujamed, H. (2012) ‘The influence of institutional and government ownership on firm performance: Evidence from Kuwait’, International Business Research, Vol. 5 No.10, pp.192-200.
• Alhajri, M. (2017) “Factors associated with the size of internal audit functions: evidence from Kuwait”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 32 No.1, pp.75-89.
• Allegrini, M. Greco, G. (2013), “Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 187-216.
• Anderson, R., Mansi, S., and Ree, D. (2003), “Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 68, pp. 263-285.
• Al-Saidi, M. and Al-Shammari, B. (2013), “Board composition and bank performance in Kuwait: an empirical study”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 28 Issue: 6, pp.472-494.
• Andres, P., Azofra, V. and Lopez, F.J. (2005), “Corporate boards in OECD countries: size composition, compensation, functioning and effectiveness”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 13, pp. 197-210.
• Ashbaugh, H. and Warfield, T. (2003), “Audits as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Evidence from the German Market”, Journal of International Accounting Research, Vol. 2, pp. 1-21.
• Asthana, S. C., Raman, K. K. and Xu, H. (2015), “US-Listed Foreign Companies’ Choice of a US-Based versus Home Country-Based Big N Principal Auditor and the Effect on Audit Fees and Earnings Quality”, Accounting Horizons, Vol 29 , No3, pp. 631–666.
• Ball, R. (2001), “Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure”, Brookings Wharton Papers on Financial Services, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 127-82.
• Beasley, M. (1996), “An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 443-465.
• Beasley M. S. and Petroni K R (2001)”, Board independence and audit-firm type”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 97-114.
• Becker CL, DeFond ML, Jiambalvo J, et al. (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 15, pp. 1–24.
• Beisland, L., Mersland, R. and Strom, R. (2015), “Audit Quality and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Microfinance Industry”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 19, pp. 218-237.
• Ben-Hassoun, A., Aloui, C. and Ben-Nasr, H. (2018), “Demand for audit quality in newly privatized firms in MENA region: Role of internal corporate governance mechanisms audit”, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol.45, pp. 334-348.
• Bhagat, S. and Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 257-273.
• Bhagat, S., Bolton, B. and Romano, R. (2008), “The promise and peril of corporate governance indices”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 108 No. 8, pp. 1803-1882.
• Bozec, Y., and Bozec, R. (2007), “Ownership concentration and corporate governance practices: Substitution or expropriation effects?”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 24, pp. 182-195.
• Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., Neal, T.L. and Riley, R.A. (2002), “Board characteristics and audit fees”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 365-384.
• Chan, P., Ezzamel, M. and Gwilliam, D. (1993), “Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 765-786.
• Cheng, S., J.H. Evans and J. Nagarajan (2008), ‘‘Board Size and Firm Performance: Moderating Effects of the Market for Corporate Control’’, Review of Quantitative Financial Accounting, Vol. 31, pp. 121-145.
• Coffee, J. C. Jr. (2002), ‘‘Racing towards the top? The impact of cross-listings and stock market competition on international corporate governance’’, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 102, No. 7, pp. 1757–831.
• Coffey, B. S., and Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17, No.14, pp. 1595– 1603.
• Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, S. and Wright, A. (2002). Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 573–594.
• Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. and Cannella, A.A. (2003), “Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 371-382.
• Davidson, R. and Neu, D. (1993), “A Note on the Association between Audit Firm Size and Audit Quality”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 479-488.
• Davis, J., Shoorman, F. and Donaldson, L. (1997), “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 20-47.
• DeAngelo, L. (1981), “Auditor Size and Audit Quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 183-199.
• DeFond, M. (1992). The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switch. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 16–31.
• DeFond, M. and Francis, J. (2005), “Audit Research after Sarbanes-Oxley”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 24, pp. 5-30.
• DeFond, M. and Zhang, Z. (2014), “A review of archival auditing research”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 58 No. 2/3, pp. 327-338.
• DeWenter, K.L. Malatesta, P.H. (2001), “State-owned and privately owned firms: an empirical analysis of profitability, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 320–334.
• Di Pietra, R. Grambovas, C.A., Raonic, I. and Riccaboni, A. (2008), The effect of board size and ‘busy’ directors on the market value of Italian companies, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 12 (1), 73-91.
• Dye, R. (1993), “Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, No. 5, pp. 887-914.
• Eshleman, J. D. and Guo, P. (2014), “Do Big 4 auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor?” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol 33, No 4, 197–219.
• European Commission (2010). Green paper: Audit policy: Lessons from the Crisis. Brussels, Belgium.
• Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983), “Separation of ownership and control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 301–325.
• Fan, J. P. H. and Wong, T. J. (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 43, No.1, pp. 35–72.
• Farbar, D. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 539–561.
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), (2013). Implementing the Recommendations of the Sharman Panel: Revised Guidance on Going Concern and Revised International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). Consultation Paper. The Financial Reporting Counsel, London, U. K.
• Firth, M. and Smith, A. (1992), “Selection of Auditor Firms by Companies in the New Issue Market”, Applied Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 247-55.
• Francis, J. and Simon, D. (1987), “A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US market”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 145-57.
• Francis, J. and Wilson, E. (1988), “Auditor Change: a joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 63, pp. 663-682.
• Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., and Saffar, W. (2014), “Auditor choice in politically connected firms”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 52, pp. 107–162.
• Guest, P.M. (2009), ‘The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence from the UK’, European Journal of Finance, Vol. 15, pp. 385-404.
• Gul, F., Fung, S. and Jaggi, B. (2009)”, Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 47, No.3, pp. 265–287.
• Haniffa, R. and Hudaib, M. (2007), “Locating audit expectations gap within a cultural context: The case of Saudi Arabia”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol. 16, pp. 179-206.
• Hassan, Y. Hijazi, R., and Naser, K. (2017), “Does audit committee substitute or complement other corporate governance mechanisms: Evidence from an emerging economy”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp.658-681.
• Hay, D. and Davis, N. (2004), “Audit fees: a meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 141-91.
• Hay, D., Knechel, W. and Wong, N. (2006), ‘Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes’, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 141–91.
• Hay, D., Knechel, W. R. and Ling, H. (2008), ‘Evidence on the impact of internal control and corporate governance on audit fees’, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.9–24.
• Hope, O., Kang, T., Thomas, W. and Yoo, Y. K. (2008), ‘Culture and auditor choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 357–73.
• Hsu, H., Lin, C. and Tsao, S. (2018), “Founding Family and Auditor Choice: Evidence from Taiwan”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 118-142.
• Hsu, W., Troy, C. and Huang, Y. (2015), “The determinants of auditor choice and audit pricing among property-liability insurers”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 34, pp.95-124.
• Huang, H.H. and Chan, M.L. (2013), “Long-term stock returns after a substantial increase in the debt ratio”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 449-460.
• Husnin, A., Nawawi, A. Salin, A. (2016) “Corporate governance and auditor quality – Malaysian evidence”, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 24 No.2, pp. 202-230.
• Hussainey, K., and Al-Najjar, B. (2012), “Understanding the determinants of Risk/Metric/ISS ratings of the quality of UK companies corporate governance practice”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 29, pp. 366-377.
• Hussainey, K., and Al-Nodel, A. (2008), “Corporate governance online reporting by Saudi companies”, Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 8, pp. 39-64.
• Hutchinson, M. and Gul, F.A. (2004), “Investment opportunity set, corporate governance practices and firm performance”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 595-614.
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), (2009). Going Concern (Revised). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 570. NY IAASB, New York.
• Jarboui, S., Guetat, H. and Boujelbène, Y. (2015), “Evaluation of hotels performance and corporate governance mechanisms: empirical evidence from the Tunisian context”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Vol. 25, pp. 30-37.
• Jensen, M. C. (2012). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 831-880.
• Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305–360.
• Jensen, M. C. (1993), “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 831–880.
• Jiraporn, P., Chintrakarn, P., Tong, S. and Treepongkaruna, S., (2018), “Does board independence substitute for external audit quality? Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock” Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 27–41
• Jizi, M. and Nehme, R. (2018), “Board monitoring and audit fees: the moderating role of CEO/chair dual roles”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 217-243.
• Johl, S.K., Subramaniam, N. and Mat Zain, M. (2012), “Audit committee and CEO ethnicity and audit fees: some Malaysian evidence”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 47 No.3, pp. 302-332.
• Johnson, W. and Lys, T. (1990), “The Market for Audit Services: Evidence from Voluntary Auditor Changes”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12, pp. 281-308.
• Jones, M. (2011). Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accountings Scandals. N.Y.:Wiley.
• Kalelkar, R. (2016), “Audit committee diligence around initial audit engagement”, Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, Vol. 33, pp. 59-67.
• Karaibrahimoğlu, Y. (2013), “Is Corporate Governance A Determinant of Auditor Choice?- Evidence From Turkey”, Ege Academic Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 273-284.
• Karim, K., Robin, A. and Suh, S. (2015), “Board structure and audit committee monitoring effects of audit committee monitoring incentives and board entrenchment on audit fees”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 248-276.
• Kim JB, Chung R and Firth M (2003) Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring, and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 20, pp. 323–359.
• Klein, A. (2002), “Economic determinants of audit committee independence”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 77 No. 2, pp. 435-452.
• Knechel, W. R., (2008), “Determinants of Auditor Choice: Evidence from a Small Client Market”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 12, pp. 65-88.
• Knechel, W. R. (2016),” Audit quality and regulation”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol 20, No3, pp. 215–223.
• Lai, K., Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. and Tsui, J. (2017), “Board Gender Diversity, Auditor Fees, and Auditor Choice”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 1681-1714.
• Lee, P., Stokes, D., Taylor, S. and Walter, T. (2003). The association between audit quality, accounting disclosures and firm-specific risk: Evidence from initial public offerings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 377–406.
• Lennox, C. (1999), “Audit Quality and Auditor Size: An Evaluation of Reputation and Deep Pockets Hypotheses”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 26, No. 7 and 8, pp.779-805.
• Lennox, C. (2005), “Audit quality and executive officers’ affiliation with CPA firms”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 201–232.
• Leuz, C. and Verrecchia, R.E. (2000), “The economic consequences of increased disclosure”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 38, Supplement Issue, pp. 91-124.
• Li, J., Pike, R. and Haniffa, R. (2008), “Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structures in UK firms”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp.137–159.
• Liao, L. , Luo, L. and Tang, Q. (2015), “Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure”, the British Accounting Review, Vol. 47, pp. 409-424.
• Lin, Z. and Liu, M. (2009), “The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, Vol., 18, pp. 44-59.
• Liu, G. S. and Sun, P. (2005). The class of owners and its impacts on corporate performance: A case of state shareholding composition in Chinese public corporations. Corporate Governance, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 46–71.
• Maletta, M. and Wright, A. (1996). Audit Evidence Planning: An Examination of Industry Error Characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 15, No.1, pp. 71-86.
• Marra, A., Mazzola, P. and Prencipe, A. (2011). Board monitoring and earnings management preand post-IFRS. The International Journal of Accounting, 46(2), pp. 205–230.
• Mendez, C. F. and Garcia, R. A. (2007), “The effects of ownership structure and board composition on the audit committee meeting frequency: Spanish evidence”, Corporate Governance, Vol.15, No. 5, pp. 909–922.
• Ntim, C.G., Lindop, S., Osei, K.A. and Thomas, D.A. (2015), ‘Executive Director Pay, Corporate Governance and Performance: A Simultaneous Equation Approach’, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 67-96.
• Ntim, C. G., Opong, K. K. and Danbolt, J. (2010), “Board size, corporate regulations and firm valuation in an emerging market: A simultaneous equation approach”, International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 194-220.
• O’Sullivan, N. (2000). The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 397- 414.
• O’Sullivan, M., Percy, M. and Stewart, J. (2008), “Australian evidence on corporate governance attributes and their association with forward-looking information in the annual report”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 12, pp. 5–35.
• OECD (2004), Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris: OECD. Palmrose, Z. V. (1988). An analysis of audit litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 55–73.
• Parker, S., Peters, G. F., and Turetsky, H. F. (2005). Corporate governance factors and auditor going-concern assessments. Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 5-29.
• Peasnell, K., Pope, P. and Young, S. (2005), “Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals?”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 32, No. 7and8, pp.1311–1346.
• Prencipe A. and Bar-Yosef, S. (2011), “Corporate Governance and Earnings Management in Family-Controlled Companies”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol. 26, No.2, pp. 199-227.
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), (2011). Concept Release on Possible Revisions to PCAOB Standards Related to Reports on Audited Financial Statements. PCAOB, Washington, DC.
• Quick, R., Schenk, N., Schmidt, F. and Towara, T. (2018), “The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: evidence from Germany”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol.22, No. 2, pp. 251-283.
• Rashid, A. (2018), “Board independence and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh”, Future Business Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 34-49.
• Reed, B. J., Trombley, M. A. and Dhaliwal, D. S. (2000). Demand for audit quality: The case of Leventhal and Horwath’s auditees. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, Vol. 15, No.2, pp.183–206.
• Salleh, Z., Stewart, J. and Manson, S. (2006). The Impact of Board Composition and Ethnicity on Audit Quality: Evidence from Malaysian Companies. Malaysian Accounting Review, Vol. 5,No. 2, pp. 61-83.
• Salterio, E., Conrod, J. and Schmidt, R. (2013), “Canadian evidence of adherence to “comply or explain” corporate governance codes: An international comparison”, Accounting Perspectives, Vol. 12, pp. 23-51.
• Sandaramurthy, C. and Lewis, M. (2003), “Contorl and Colleabroation: Paradoxes of Government. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, pp. 397-416.
• Shukeri, S., Shin, O. and Shaari, M. (2012), “Does board directors characteristics affect firm performance? Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies,” International Business Research, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 120-127.
• Srinidhi, N., He, S. and Firth, M. (2014), “The Effect of Governance on Specialist Auditor Choice and Audit Fees in U.S. Family Firms”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 2297-2329.
• Sweeney, A. (1994). Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 281–308.
• Upadhyay, A.D., Bhargava, R. and Faircloth, S.D. (2013), “Board structure and role of monitoring committees”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67 No. 7, pp. 1486-1492.
• Vittinghoff, E., and McCulloch, C. (2006), “Relaxing the Rule of Ten Events per Variable in Logistic and Cox Regression” American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 165, Issue 6, 15 March 2007, pp. 710–718
• Uzun, H., Szewczyk, S. and Varma, R. (2004). Board composition and corporate fraud. Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 33–43.
• Watts, R. and Zimmerman, J. (1978), “Toward a positive Theory of the determination of accounting standards”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 112-134.
• Watts, R. and Zimmermann, J. (1983), “Agency Problems, Auditing and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 613-633.
• Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., and Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the Joint Determination of Audit and Non-Audit Fees. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 41, No.4, pp. 721-744.
• Woodward, D. G. (1997). Book Reviews: FEE 1994 investigation of emerging accounting areas. The British Accounting Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 90–93.
• Wu, X. (2012), “Corporate governance and audit fees: evidence from companies listed on the Shanghai stock exchange”, China Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 321–342.
• Xie, B., Davidson, W. and DaDalt, P. (2003), “Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 9, No. 3,pp. 295-316.
• Yang, J. and Krishnan, J. (2005), “Audit committees and quarterly earnings management”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 9, pp. 201-19.
• Yermack, D. (1996), “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 185-212.
• Yasin, H. and Shehab, I. (2004) “Monitoring and Overseeing Disclosure” presented in the Corporate Governance in MENA Countries: Improving Transparency and Disclosure, the Second Middle East and North Africa Regional Corporate Governance Forum, Beirut, June.3-5.
• Yeoh, E. and Jubb, C. (2002), “Governance and Audit Quality: Is there an Association? “American Accounting Association Auditing Section Midyear Conference, Orlando, Florida, United States.
How to Cite
Al-Hajri, Meshari O. 2019. “Corporate Governance and Auditor Choice in Kuwait”. Studies in Business and Economics 21 (1).